The Impact of Gender Equality-Based Learning Programs on Character Building in Undergraduate Midwifery Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in DKI Jakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Gender inequality significantly affects women's reproductive health and overall well-being. Midwives play a crucial role in addressing these issues through gender-equitable practices.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of gender equality-based learning programs in shaping the character of undergraduate midwifery students.
Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 298 midwifery students in DKI Jakarta was conducted. Data collection used sequential sampling and a validated questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. Logistic regression analyzed associations between students' characteristics and gender-equitable character.
Results: Students with poor gender knowledge were 30 times more likely to exhibit gender-inequity characters (OR=30.18, 95% CI=11.40-79.91). Negative attitudes towards gender concepts increased the risk of gender-inequity characters by 44% (OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.05-1.98). A learning environment lacking gender equity doubled this risk (OR=2.83, 95% CI=1.98-4.04).
Conclusion: Incorporating gender-equitable concepts and practices into midwifery curricula is essential for developing gender-equitable midwives. This integration could reduce gender disparities and improve health outcomes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles and files in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Binfa, Pantoja, Gonzalez, Ransjö-Arvidson, & Robertson. (2011). Chilean midwives and midwifery students’ views of women’s midlife health-care needs. Midwifery, 27(4), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.009
Communications, G. S. for M. (2019). The Mobile Gender Gap Report 2019.
Erdol, A., & Gözütok. (2018). Development of gender equality curriculum and it’s reflective assessment. Turkish Journal of Education, 7(3), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.376480
Goodman, & Mahmood. (2019). The Rohingya Refugee Crisis of Bangladesh: Gender Based Violence and the Humanitarian Response. Open Journal of Political Science, 09(03), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2019.93027
Gupta, Oomman, Grown, Conn, Hawkes, Shawar, & Shiffman. (2019). Gender equality and gender norms: framing the opportunities for health. The Lancet, 393(10190), 2550–2562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30651-8
Hamberg, & Johansson. (2016). Medical students’ attitudes to gender issues in the role and career of physicians: A qualitative study conducted in Sweden. Medical Teacher, 28(7), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600871007
Hyde, J. S., & Mezulis, A. H. (2020). Gender Differences in Depression: Biological, Affective, Cognitive, and Sociocultural Factors. In Harvard Review of Psychiatry (Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 4–13). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000230
Ichwan, Susana, & Sari, N. (2022). The Effectiveness of Antenatal Care with a Gender Responsive Approach. Journal of Midwifery, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.25077/jom.7.1.8-15.2022
Kennedy, Binder, Humphries, Tidhar, Cini, Comrie-Thomson, Vaughan, Francis, Scott, & Wulan. (2020). Gender inequalities in health and wellbeing across the first two decades of life: an analysis of 40 low-income and middle-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region. The Lancet Global Health, 8(12), e1473–e1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30354-5
Madlala, Ngxongo, & Sibiya. (2021). Perceptions of student accoucheurs regarding gender inequality in midwifery training at Free State maternal healthcare institutions. Curationis, 44(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v44i1.1988
Maryanah, Supradewi, & Barkinah. (2021). The Impact of The Strengthened Gender Sensitive Midwifery Care on Pregnant Women’s Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Midwifery Care. Women, Midwives and Midwifery, 1(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.36749/wmm.1.3.39-46.2021
Newman, Pacqué-Margolis, & Frymus. (2016). Integration of gender-transformative interventions into health professional education reform for the 21st century: Implications of an expert review. Human Resources for Health, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0109-8
Pourhoseingholi, Vahedi, & Rahimzadeh. (2013). Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 6(1), 14–17.
Riwu, R. R., Toy, S. M., Boeky, D. L. A., & Folamauk, C. L. H. (2018). A gender analysis of traditional contraceptive use in Sikka district, east nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(11), 1881–1886. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01722.9
Sakurai, Miura, Takamura, Ota, Ishizaki, Morikawa, Kido, Naruse, & Nakagawa. (2016). Gender differences in the association between anthropometric indices of obesity and blood presssure in Japanese. Hypertension Research, 29(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.29.75
Supradewi, & Rajab. (2013). Gender Mainstreaming In Midwifery Program Studies Cipto Mangunkusumo Polytechnic Jakarta III. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE2013), Isqae.
Verdonk, Benschop, Haes, D., & Lagro-Janssen. (2009). From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(1), 135–152.
Yilmaz. (2018). The effectiveness of a gender equality course in changing undergraduate midwifery students— attitudes towards domestic violence and gender roles. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 9(2), 840–847.
Young, & Scherrer. (2010). Introduction: Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in International Political Economy. In Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845223858-9