The Impact of The Strengthened Gender Sensitive Midwifery Care on Pregnant Women’s Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Midwifery Care

Main Article Content

Maryanah Maryanah
Indra Supradewi
Tut Barkinah


Background: Gender sensitive midwifery services are needed by women, especially during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. Gender inequality in society has a negative impact on the acceptance of antenatal care for mothers. Gender sensitive midwifery care is needed to improve maternal health status during pregnancy.

Purpose: This study aims to determine the impact of gender sensitive midwifery care on pregnant women’s knowledge, attitude and acceptance of midwifery care

Method: This was a quantitative experimental study with pre-posttest for 1 group design. The subjects of this study were pregnant women who received midwifery care from 40 midwives, totaling 200 pregnant women obtained through purposive sampling in 2 provinces. Paired t-test was used to measure the difference in the results of the variables measured in pregnant women before and after 3 months of the intervention given by midwives.

Results: Pregnant women’s knowledge, attitude and acceptance of midwifery care increased after they received intervention from midwives. The mean difference (MD) for knowledge was -2.07 (r=0.864), p value=0.000 in DKI Jakarta, and MD=-2.70 (r=0.467), p value= 0.000 in South Kalimantan. For attitude in DKI Jakarta, MD=-1.03 (r= 0.99, p value=0.000) and in South Kalimantan the mean difference (MD) was -2.8 (r= 0.445, p value=0.000). For acceptance of gender sensitive midwifery care in DKI Jakarta MD=-2.71 (r= 0.67, p value= 0.000) and South Kalimantan MD=-4.5 (r= p value=0.000).

Conclusion: There was a difference and increase in score for knowledge, attitude and acceptance of midwifery care with gender sensitivity in pregnant women before and after the intervention was given to the midwives in the two provinces. It takes great attention from midwives to ensure that all pregnant women receive a gender sensitive midwifery care.



Article Details

How to Cite
Maryanah, M., Supradewi, I. ., & Barkinah, T. . (2021). The Impact of The Strengthened Gender Sensitive Midwifery Care on Pregnant Women’s Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Midwifery Care . Women, Midwives and Midwifery, 1(3), 39-46.



Alhassan, Spieker, Ostenberg, Ogink, Nketiah-Amponsah, & Wit, D. (2013). Association between health worker motivation and healthcare quality efforts in Ghana. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), 1–11.

Bakker, Sheferaw, Stekelenburg, Yigzaw, & Kroon, D. (2020). Development and use of a scale to assess gender differences in appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth among Ethiopian midwifery students. PLoS ONE, 15(1), 1–15.

Betron, McClair, Currie, & Banerjee. (2018). Expanding the agenda for addressing mistreatment in maternity care: A mapping review and gender analysis Prof. Suellen Miller. Reproductive Health, 15(1), 1–13.

Carolan. (2011). The good midwife: Commencing students’ views. Midwifery, 27(4), 503–508.

Erulkar, Mekbib, Simie, & Gulema. (2004). The Experience of Adolescence in Rural Amhara Region Ethiopia - Joint study of the Population Council, United Nations Population Fund and UNICEF. In Population Council.

Filby, McConville, & Portela. (2016). What prevents quality midwifery care? A systematic mapping of barriers in low and middle income countries from the provider perspective. PLoS ONE, 11(5), 1–20.

Hoque. (2015). Summary of Indonesia’s Gender Analysis. In ADB Papers on Indonesia, October(06).;

Horton, & Astudillo. (2014). The power of midwifery. The Lancet, 384(9948), 1075–1076.

Kak, Burkhalter, & Cooper. (2015). 2001 USAID Measuring-the-competence-of-healthcare-providers. USAID Measuring, 1(1), 1–28. papers3://publication/uuid/5D690D7B-DA4F-4EA0-9F39-25D55C1FB1DC

Kalin. (2011). Access to and Utilization of Health Services in Rural Bangladesh: A Gender Perspective. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, School of Economics and Management, September.

Li. (2004). Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county. Social Science and Medicine, 59(4), 695–708.

ParfaitM, & Eloundou-Enyegue. (2004). Pregnancy-Related Dropouts and Gender Inequality in Education?: A Life-Table Approach and Application to Cameroon. Demography, 41(3), 509–528.

Renfrew, McFadden, Bastos, Campbell, Channon, Cheung, Silva, Downe, Kennedy, Malata, McCormick, Wick, & Declercq. (2014). Midwifery and quality care: Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet, 384(9948), 1129–1145.

Souza, Gülmezoglu, Vogel, Carroli, Lumbiganon, Qureshi, Costa, Fawole, Mugerwa, Nafiou, Neves, Wolomby-Molondo, Bang, Cheang, Chuyun, Jayaratne, Jayathilaka, Mazhar, Mori, & Say. (2013). Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 381(9879), 1747–1755.

Supradewi, & Rajab. (2013). Gender Mainstreaming In Midwifery Program Studies Cipto Mangunkusumo Polytechnic Jakarta III. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE2013), Isqae.

Tunçalp, Were, Maclennan, Oladapo, Gülmezoglu, Bahl, Daelmans, Mathai, Say, Kristensen, Temmerman, & Bustreo. (2015). Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns - The WHO vision. BJOG: An International. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122(8), 1045–1049.

Vir. (2016). Improving women’s nutrition imperative for rapid reduction of childhood stunting in South Asia: Coupling of nutrition specific interventions with nutrition sensitive measures essential. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 12(1), 72–90.

Yusran, Thomas, Matoka, & Mokodompit. (2020). Unequal Access to Maternal and Neonatal Health in Indonesia with Gender Perspective.